topic: fuck cars and fuck suvs in particular

introduction:

  • problem: cars are bad, suvs are worse

conclusion:

  • solvable problem
  • solution: don’t build infrastructure car-first

pollution:

  • 28% of greenhouse gas emissions in the US are from transport although globally it’s more like 18% 1

car size increasing:

  • between 2015 and 2021 almost 20% market share increase in suvs from ~35% to ~55% 2
  • SUVs, vans, and pickups accounted for 63% of new vehicles sold in the U. S. in 2021 2
  • weight ranges from 2.2k pounds up to 6k pounds 3
    more infrastructure for cars is needed (parking spaces)
    induced demand: more available space leads to more cars leads to more needed space
    space could be used more efficiently, e.g. for homes, schools etc. etc. (highway interchange in Houston, TX (population: 0) covers about the same area as the town of Siena, Italy (population: 30k))

safety:

  • a car’s a weapon vehicular manslaughter
  • car-centric areas are built for efficient transportation of cars, not for the safety of non-car inhabitants

“us citizens need more space”:

  • amsterdam-warsaw is 1200km NYC, NY - Chicago, IL is about the same
  • however: 69% of travel occur in urban areas 2

freedom yee haw:

  • cars aren’t accessible to everyone car-centric areas are actually less yee-haw freedom
    children and teenagers, the elderly, people who otherwise can’t or don’t want to drive

“cars don’t pay taxes”
meeeee :3 :

VehicleApproximate vehicle weight in poundsComparative level of damage
9 ton big-rig18,000410.0625
Hummer H28,60021.3675
Chevy Tahoe5,5003.5745
Toyota Highlander4,2501.2744
Average Car4,0001.000
RAV 43,5500.6204
Prius3,0500.3380
Smart Car1,8000.0410
Fat Man on a Freakishly Heavy Bicycle3500.00006

“So let’s talk about this in terms of taxes. For the sake of argument, let’s say that every 1,000 miles traveled in an average sized car equals $1’s worth of damage to the road that will have to come out of City coffers for repair work. A bicyclist would have to travel over 17 million miles to cause the same $1’s worth of damage.  Or another way to look at that, for the $1’s worth of damage that a car does to a road, a bicycle, traveling the same distance on the same road, would perpetrate $0.0005862 worth of damage. That’s about a tenth of a ha’penny [half-penny].”

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20160516133647/http://pedalfortcollins.com/greatest-demand-on-tax-dollars/

Full text

Elon Musk once said: “Defeating traffic is the ultimate boss battle. Even the most powerful humans in the world cannot defeat traffic.”
According to Mr. Musk, I would be more powerful than the most powerful humans in the world, since I just did mere <amount of minutes I arrived> ago.

As you might’ve figured, today I’d like to talk about cars. Specifically, I’d like to show you why car-centric cities is the worst possible direction for modern infrastructure to have evolved to.
Before starting, I should clarify: Banning cars outright is not the solution presented here. There are real, justified applications for cars. But Karen driving little Timmy a kilometer to school every day in her 3 ton SUV and ideally hitting 3 pedestrians and a cyclist on the way there is definitely not one of them.

Now, lets further introduce the problem:
Cars are getting bigger and heavier. Between 2015 and 2021, the SUV market share increased by almost 20% from ~35% to ~55% in the US 2. SUVs, vans, and pickups accounted for 63% of new vehicles sold in the U. S. in 2021 2. The weight of these vehicles reaches up to 3 tons. 3
As a result, more space for cars is needed - bigger roads, more parking spaces, new highways. This creates an effect known as “induced demand”: more available space leads to more cars, leading to more needed space.
This space could be used more efficiently, e.g. for housing or schools. For example: A certain highway interchange in Houston, TX (population: 0) covers about the same area as the town of Siena, Italy (population: 30k). Well, what space is used more efficiently?

This, of course, isn’t everything. As you all know, another major issue with cars is pollution; in the US, 28% of greenhouse gas emissions come from transport (although globally it’s more like 18%) 1. But pollution is not the only impact cars have on the environment.
I already mentioned car weight being a problem. Well, let’s consider road damage caused by the massive weight. Lets compare road damage of an average car weighting around 1.8 tons with a “Fat Man on a Freakishly Heavy Bicycle” coming in at a hefty 160 kgs.

“For the sake of argument, let’s say that every 1,000 miles traveled […] equals $1’s worth of damage to the road that will have to come out of City coffers for repair work. A bicyclist would have to travel over 17 million miles to cause the same $1’s worth of damage.  Or another way to look at that, for the $1’s worth of damage that a car does to a road, a bicycle, traveling the same distance on the same road, would perpetrate $0.0005862 worth of damage. ”

Two other important aspects to consider are accessibility and safety.
Car-centric infrastructure is built for efficient transportation of cars, not for the safety of pedestrians or cyclists. Elderly or disabled folk are now at a disadvantage and inherently unsafe. However, along with children, teenagers or people who simply do not want to drive they cannot access transport by car.
Also, I have yet to see a bike hitting a bus stop, fatally injuring everyone besides its driver and destroying the bus stop in the process. Unlike a bike, a car is a weapon.

And the best part: It isn’t even peak freedom in personal transportation. A bike doesn’t require neither a registration, a license nor any insurance and is barely regulated. It can go anywhere you can and the environmental impact is minimal - it’s fueled with determination and whatever you had for breakfast this morning.

To come to a conclusion, traffic is a solvable problem. We don’t have to put up with the environmental impact, accessibility and safety concerns of car-centric infrastructure. If we were to build bike- and pedestrian-first along with strong public transport most people, those problems could be solved. Given the audience, this is probably unneccessary, but: Be the change. Take the bike. Take the bus. Thank you.

Footnotes

Footnotes

  1. https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector 2

  2. https://css.umich.edu/publications/factsheets/mobility/personal-transportation-factsheet 2 3 4 5

  3. https://www.jdpower.com/cars/shopping-guides/dimensions-and-weights-of-common-suvs 2